Sint

Sometimes I'm an idiot.  Like, really very dumb.  It stems from a place of ignorance, which is a little ironic given how arrogant I am about my knowledge and intelligence.  But the fact of the matter is, I (sadly) don't know everything about horror, and I really don't know much about European continental horror.  And if I'm being honest, I'm not always keen to watch and learn, either.  I gotta be in the right mood.  You know what I mean.  But when first I heard about Sint a year ago, I was immediately sold on the idea of a Dutch horror movie about an evil St. Nicholas.

The Dutch "Christmas" is St. Nicholas Day, which falls on December 6.  The night before and the day of celebrate St. Nicholas' birthday, during which he brings presents to all the good children.  According to legend, bad children are rounded up by his helper, Black Peter, placed in sack, and shipped off to Spain.

Sint spins a much darker yarn.  In it, the generous Sinterklaas of legend is recast as an immortal Bishop hellbent on murder.  When the full moon shines on December 5, St. Nicholas arrives to exact his bloody vengeance upon Amsterdam.  Goert has seen Sinterklaas in action, and he's done his best to warn his colleagues at the police about the danger, but they all think he's nuts.  So when people start dying after sunset on December 5, no one's quite ready to accept that Sinterklaas is to blame.

From what I understand, The Netherlands doesn't produce a whole lot of horror, which leads me conclude the country hasn't developed its own special genre aesthetic.  But still I was surprised by Sint's straight-up slasher nature.  Stylistically the film follows American horror conventions, but it isn't stupid, insipid, or insulting to its audience's intelligence.

Except for the part where they describe St. Nicholas' ship as a schooner.  It's clearly a carrack.

Sint is a fun watch, and is fairly imaginative by North American standards.  The gore is delightfully ridiculous, and the movie maintains a fairly light tone.  Of importance to this reviewer is the fact that Sint doesn't make a big deal about religion or morality, which I found both surprising and refreshing.  The film does end on a bit of a down note, which brings it more inline with what I assume is a Dutch tradition of downer or ambiguous endings.

This holiday season, if you're looking for something in the evil Santa vein, but with a bit of a twist, this Dutch take on a Christmas horror tradition is well worth it.  Foreign without being alienating, Sint is also good movie to broaden your scope of European genre film.

For other Xmas alternatives, check this out!

Bad Ideas About Good Things

I found out today that Spielberg will not be remaking Oldboy with Will Smith. This is good news.


I had a conversation/argument with a friend about film. He argued that all movies should be made with *all audiences* in mind. To be fair, he was extrapolating from Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds, believing the movie to be both insulting to Germans and inaccessible to Anglos. But his point was that a filmmaker must keep in mind that diverse audiences around the world will likely see his film and said filmmaker must therefore make a movie to which all peoples can relate. I disagreed.

His argument brought to mind this one time I went to TIFF. My friends and I saw Mechanism. It's a great movie, very violent and painted a grim picture of Yugoslavia. The director was there for Q&A and this woman in the crowd stood up and denounced him and his film, telling him that as an artist, it was his responsibility to produce something beautiful and positive. In response the director said that, as a filmmaker, it is his responsibility to make movies. Nothing more.

Movies are made to be seen. That's a given. But most filmmakers are working within a particular culture, following a particular set of rules or values, and are, at times, circumscribed by particular directives within the film industry. All this is to say that a film made by country X is generally best understood by audience X. But that doesn't preclude the film from being shown in countries Y and Z--it's just the nature of the business.

Maybe I'm missing the point.

The remake industry is huge--I understand that. But I don't understand why. I don't understand why Hollywood deems it necessary to "Americanize" foreign film. A good movie will get asses in seats, weather it be in English or Greek. Granted there are movie buffs out there who prefer not to "read the movie" (my roommate is one), but I feel these people are both being cheated and cheating themselves out of a lot a really great films. The cultural appropriation and assimilation that takes place when a film is remade by Hollywood strips the movie of what made it special in the first place. I'm not only talking about story, I mean the movie as a whole--they way it looks, its atmosphere, sounds, editing, etc.

So, getting back to my disgruntled friend, what he fails to understand is that film will always find an audience. I, for example, like J-horror and though I don't speak the language or understand a lot about the culture, my personal enjoyment isn't lessened any because of these shortcomings. However, it would seem to me that Hollywood thinks differently. And what's worse is their apparent (or presumed) misunderstanding of the source material. Let The Right One In is being remade as Let Me In and this change in title puts an entirely different spin on things.

Do I think Spielberg could have done something interesting with Old Boy? Possibly. Do I think Will Smith is up to the task? I guess. But the film's morality, violence, and conclusion are so far outside the accepted norm for mainstream American cinema that I doubt Hollywood could actually make the same film. I'm sure there's a script sitting in a desk somewhere that's written in English and just as good.